Search
Latest comments
- catzmae: I must say that overall I am really impressed with this blog. It is easy to see that you are passionate about your writing. This could be a good topic for a religion essay. Thanks for sharing an interesting post!...
- catzmae: I must say that overall I am really impressed with this blog. It is easy to see that you are passionate about your writing. This could be a good topic for a religion essay. Thanks for sharing an interesting post!...
- catzmae: I must say that overall I am really impressed with this blog. It is easy to see that you are passionate about your writing. This could be a good topic for a religion essay. Thanks for sharing an interesting post!...
- mess855: Buying beautiful, erogenous as well as clever lady lingerie isn't just like daydreaming about clicking on sexy lingerie advertisement on Google or other search engines that you love. Purchasing cheap lingerie wholesale could be an extremely joyful affair and it...
- mess855: Buying beautiful, erogenous as well as clever lady lingerie isn't just like daydreaming about clicking on sexy lingerie advertisement on Google or other search engines that you love. Purchasing cheap lingerie wholesale could be an extremely joyful affair and it...
Categories
Books Roger is reading
Archives
Favorite Links
News feeds
Regeneration feed (Graeme)
FutureChurch Journey feed (Roger)
ALL site posts feed
Log In
Warning: Parameter 1 to NP_Poll::event_PreItem() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/futurech/public_html/old/admin/libs/MANAGER.php on line 319
What puurty colours!
Posted by: Roger Saner
Tim has asked me to post these 2 thingies (and also to stop keeping him up at night!):
And it's possibly time I went to sleep. I've spent way too much time redoing this site theme and upgrading to a lovely puke green and sky blue, and adding things like the correct rss feeds into each page (we run 3 separate feeds off this site). Mind you, it is now more navigable and searchable (but the commenting system still annoys me). Hope you like it!
-It is clear in my article that the main focus is on Brian McClaren. And any honest observer will admit that the other guys are also very linked in ideology/philosophy with the overall movement, all technicalities and qualifications aside.Yes, he's right with his first point (and the second too, obviously) - and so, it is now time to move on and stop talking about his methodology in his article, and to address the actual issues he brings up. The best way to do this, I think, is to get everyone together for a good old fashioned witch burning (I think Monty Python do it best). All we need is, well, a witch. "Stone her!" How do you know she's a witch? Well, she looks like a witch. "Stone her!" What does a witch look like? Dunno. "Stone her!" Have you ever seen a witch? No. "Stone her!" ... etc etc etc. If anyone knows where to find a witch, please tell me. It'll help if she's not slightly damp, either.
-The Gilley seminar at HBC has been planned for months, as seen on our handouts printed long ago (and as Graeme will testify); it just got overlooked by our webmaster who was just focusing on the main conference. Apologies for that.
And it's possibly time I went to sleep. I've spent way too much time redoing this site theme and upgrading to a lovely puke green and sky blue, and adding things like the correct rss feeds into each page (we run 3 separate feeds off this site). Mind you, it is now more navigable and searchable (but the commenting system still annoys me). Hope you like it!
Comments
And this is to test if comments are working...
reply to this commentA test to see if our little spam control thing works...
reply to this commentA conflict between the image captcha module and the cache module has rendered commenting impossible for the last 2 days - apologies about that. I've disabled the captcha module until I can figure out how the two can coexist peacefully (just like the emerging church and the rest of Christianity!) - which means a lot of spam in the meantime (hmmm...there's a metaphor in there somewhere...)
reply to this comment